The Instructor Evaluation form
There are comments below this table.
| Question | Mean | N | St. Dev. |
| Attitudes Towards Economics Percent answering YES | |||
| I enjoy reading articles about economic topics. | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| I enjoy economics. | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| On occasion I read an unassigned book in economics. | 18 | 11 | 40 |
| Economics is dull. | 18 | 11 | 40 |
| I would be willing to attend a lecture by an economist. | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| Economics is a very difficult subject for me. | 18 | 11 | 40 |
| Economics is one of my favorite subjects. | 36 | 11 | 50 |
| I use economic concepts to analyze situations. | 82 | 11 | 40 |
| Economics is practical. | 100 | 11 | 0 |
| Economics is easy for me to understand. | 64 | 11 | 50 |
| FSU Instructor Evaluation 1 is highest, 5 is lowest | |||
| Feedback to student for performance in course | 2.55 | 11 | 157 |
| Instructor interested in your learning | 2.73 | 11 | 179 |
| Use of class time | 2.64 | 11 | 92 |
| Instructor overall organization of course | 3.09 | 11 | 114 |
| Continuity between lectures | 2.73 | 11 | 127 |
| Pace of course | 2.55 | 11 | 137 |
| Communication of ideas and information | 2.91 | 11 | 138 |
| Express expectations for performance | 2.82 | 11 | 160 |
| Available to assist students | 2.55 | 11 | 186 |
| Respect and concern for students | 2.55 | 11 | 186 |
| Stimulation of interest | 2.73 | 11 | 142 |
| Facilitation of learning | 2.64 | 11 | 150 |
| Overall assessment of instructor | 2.73 | 11 | 142 |
| Wash. Univ. CourseEvaluation Answers are Percent Yes except for overall ratings | |||
| Organization of Course | |||
| Syllabus available when course started | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Course materials were available at beginning of semester | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Course lives up to its description | 83 | 12 | 39 |
| Understood grading policies at the outset | 67 | 12 | 49 |
| Length of class meeting appropriate | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the ORGANIZATION OF THIS COURSE | 7.17 | 12 | 229 |
| Your grades accurately reflect your understanding of the material | 80 | 10 | 42 |
| Comments on written work sufficient-useful | 90 | 10 | 32 |
| Exam(s) covered what you expected | 86 | 7 | 38 |
| Instructor was available to discuss exams and written work | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| Satisfied with the instructors availability during exams | 100 | 7 | 0 |
| Understood grades received | 89 | 9 | 33 |
| Your questions answered satisfactorily | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the GRADING PROCESS | 8.36 | 11 | 196 |
| Reasonable time to complete assignments | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Course met stated objectives | 83 | 12 | 39 |
| Work load was appropriate | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Assignments-exercises-problems beneficial | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Positively challenged by the course | 92 | 12 | 29 |
| Course too easy | 8 | 12 | 29 |
| Presentation was balanced in point of view | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the COURSE CONTENT | 8.50 | 12 | 100 |
| Instructor | |||
| Concerned for students Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Enthusiastic about course Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Classroom participation encouraged Prof. Parks | 83 | 12 | 39 |
| Respected student's opinions Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Made the course interesting Prof. Parks | 92 | 12 | 29 |
| Positively challenged to learn the material Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Demonstrated expertise in the course material Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Was easy to follow Prof. Parks | 73 | 11 | 47 |
| Was well organized-prepared for classes Prof. Parks | 67 | 12 | 49 |
| Ideas and concepts clearly presented Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| You could hear and understand Prof. Parks | 100 | 12 | 0 |
| Office hours established and kept Prof. Parks | 91 | 11 | 30 |
| Instructor was available for questions Prof. Parks | 100 | 11 | 0 |
| Generally on time for class Prof. Parks | 75 | 12 | 45 |
| Tests-quizes papers returned promptly Prof. Parks | 60 | 10 | 52 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the QUALITY OF TEACHING for this course Prof. Parks | 8.08 | 12 | 193 |
| Instructor | |||
| Concerned for students Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Enthusiastic about course Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Classroom participation encouraged Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Respected student's opinions Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Made the course interesting Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Positively challenged to learn the material Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Demonstrated expertise in the course material Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Was easy to follow Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Was well organized-prepared for classes Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Ideas and concepts clearly presented Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| You could hear and understand Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Office hours established and kept Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Instructor was available for questions Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Generally on time for class Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| Tests-quizes papers returned promptly Ms. Compton | 100 | 2 | 0 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the QUALITY OF TEACHING for this course Ms. Compton | 1000 | 2 | 0 |
| F=0,1=D-,2=D,3=C-,4=C,5=C+,6=B-,7=B,8=B+,9=A-,10=A | |||
| Overall rating for the QUALITY OF TEACHING for this course Ms. Compton | 1000 | 1 | . |
| Overall rating for the QUALITY OF TEACHING for this course T. Asst | 1000 | 1 | . |
| OVERALL Evaluation | 8.17 | 12 | 164 |
MEAN
The means for yes no questions are percentages YES while the means for the ratings variables
are the mean for their scale (1-5 for FSU; 0-10 for Washington University).
N
The number of non-missing responses SD
The standard deviation
Created at Fri Apr 26 12:13:28 CDT 2002